Ever forgotten to take the chicken off your head - or just couldn't be bothered?
Annmarie Carr - HIT
Communicating with frequent and heavy cannabis users
Perception
regarding risks that can be related to cannabis use
Home Office Commission
Conclusions
It is reported in the 2000 British Crime Survey that in England and Wales lifetime cannabis use between 1981 and 2000 amongst those aged 20 - 24 years increased from 12% to 52%
HIT began to perceive cannabis in a different light
Feedback
from customers about working with cannabis users
Local research and dissertation
International research and evidence
HIT
felt that there was an inadequacy in the current response
Current publications
did not meet customers needs
New materials should provides a brief intervention
based on Australian model (Jan Copeland 2003)
HIT has produced several new information initiatives over the last two years to meet the demand for cannabis information
Cannabis and the law, booklet and cards
Reclassification
caused confusion particularly with the young
Information about currant cannabis
law relevant to those over and under 18 years old
Know Cannabis
Aimed at young people giving information about
Law
Health risks
Methods of use
Practical advice on controlling use
Self
help website
NB - see UKCIA comments about "Know Cannabis"
Updating cannabis booklet to include harm reduction
Information on the effects, risks and problems of using cannabis - including respiratory risks, memory loss and mental health, smoking harm reduction advice, advice on how to cut down or stop using.
First perspectives on cannabis conference
A one day conference covering the societal, culture, legal,public health, and medical aspects of cannabis debate.
Training courses "Gone to pot"
Smoking
cessation workers across North west have attended the course. Learning objectives
include:
To highlight the effects, risks and harms associated with cannabis
To consider interventions with cannabis users - concerns, approaches and
techniques
Home Office Intervention
HIT
commissioned to communicate with frequent and heavy users across the UK
Concern
that reclassification gave the impression that cannabis was risk free
New Home Office intervention to be informed by:
Previous
HIT work
Research conducted by independent research group (Cragg, Ross and
Dawson)
Sample form four areas of Britain
Aged 13 - 40+ years
Home Office Research - Positives for user
Congratulated
themselves on choice of drug, natural, healthier, benign and a medicine
Exclusive
club for cool people, chilled out, relaxed unlike "squares" (!)
Music, art, conversation all heightened - bonding is big
Rituals around rolling
joints important and enjoyable
* Attributes and beliefs were consistent across
all respondents
Home Office Research - Negative effects
Lethargy
- underachieving, get in a rut
Dependency
Minor mental health problems,
short term memory loss, anxiety and paranoia
Relationship problems - home,
work
Respiratory problems - asthma, sore throat etc
Cost - some spending
up to £100 a week
* "agreed amusement" about negative effects
Home Office Research - Future education needs
Information
should be from a credible source (Howard Marks)
Credibility through discussion
- using cannabis using networks
No prohibition agenda
Details are important
(shape of leaf!)
HIT campaign for the Home Office
Aim
1
To increase knowledge of the problems associated with heavy and frequent
use of cannabis
Aim 2
To give practical advice and support to those choosing
to cut down or stop their cannabis use
Objective
1
To engage heavy and frequent cannabis users by using acknowledged shared
experiences and problems in promotional products such as magazine adverts and
posters
Objective 2
Cannabis using network used to disseminate campaign
messages (head shops, specialist magazines, record shops)
Objective
3
Provide information in a way which allows frequent and heavy users to assess
the impact cannabis has on their life
Objective 4
Allow frequent and and
heavy users to make an informed decision about reducing or stopping their cannabis
use,and to provide materials that will help support them
Development of promotional materials to engage the user group
NB Several slides were shown of poster ideas which were rejected - including the one about forgetting to take the chicken off you head. The home Office rejected a lot of the ideas.
Politics
- ministers became responsible for the campaign
It was seen as controversial
Though to trivialize the issue
Know Cannabis - Campaign branding
Posters
"Starting
to feel anxious?"
Designed to make target group consider how dependent
they have become on cannabis
"Have
you become an expert?"
Designed to make the target group consider if
they are in a rut
Information booklet
Addressing
the effects
Dependency
Smoking risks
Mental health
Debt
Relationships
Law
A guide to cutting down and stopping cannabis use
Are
you psychologically dependent on cannabis?
Short term and long term problems
What are the reasons for wanting to change?
Plan to change
Withdrawal
Have a back-up plan
Practitioners pack
Introduction
by minister
Guidance on how to use materials
Leaflets
Booklets
Posters
Distribution of materials
Formal
sites included
Connexions, YOT's and youth services,smoking cessation groups,
GP's A&E departments
Informal
site included
Head shops, music venues, record shops, student welfare officers,
tan shops, barbers
Website
Cannabis
information
Tips and techniques to reduce risks
Cannabis quiz to asses
individual level of use and risk
Self-help section for those wanting to cut
down or give up
Links to helpful organisations
Feedback
Website feedback
Website users asked to give feedback, there were three groups
Those
who said it was helpful
Those who were confused by the poliarised debate (particularly
other websites)
Those who were angry - these were the majority
Examples of feedback:
You
are government prohibitionists only interested in giving a negative slant
The website is inaccurate and detrimental - congratulations in perpetuating the
cascade of skewed information
Wake up and smell the coffeeshops, tell the
truth, educate the nation of the herb that could heal nations
The
website is another additive tot he big lies that the corrupt politicians are desperately
holding up
You are persecuting people who cause no problems and who are law
abiding except for their use of the herb
Yet another site of lying propaganda.
Cannabis DOES NOT CAUSE DEPRESSION and in fact the best medicine for depression
HIT
have never received such defensive feedback about any other drug information campaign
Nearly all pointed out cannabis is not as dangerous as alcohol (we never claimed
it was)
Difficult to imagine the same response from users of alcohol, cocaine
etc
Conclusions
Communicating
cannabis information is complex
Credibility is difficult to achieve
Difficult
to find imagery and message that appeal to a wide group of people
Bipolar
debate, seemingly no middle ground
Giving balanced view prove to be problematic
(commissioners vs target group)
NB Government agenda is blocking effective communication with users.
Government
agencies open to new ways Of communicating
Working with government agencies
means some restriction influenced by policies, not needs.